Fran Dreser claimed victory in his race for president of the SAG-Eftra on Thursday night and promised to stop arms and “get out of the violence” with his fellow union members.
It’s hard to say.
Dresser has taken charge of a union that is famously divided, and more divided than in recent years.
Even after defeating “The Nanny” star Matthew Modin by a narrow margin, Modin’s disgruntled group-membership won a seat on the First-National Board, Los Angeles took control of the locals and won the election for National Secretary-Treasurer, the union’s third-ranked ranking.
Dresser’s team – the Unit for Strength – will still gain a majority on the national board, observers say. And as president, Dresser will decide who will serve on which committee – including the committee that will discuss the union’s next TV / drama deal in 2023.
But at least 2.5.5% of voters in the suggestion rank-and-file of the benefits received by Membership First suggest increased dissatisfaction among those who returned their ballots.
“There is no order to steamrolle what France dresser wants to do,” said Shan Sharma, a veteran of SAG-AFTRA politics who supported the first membership. “There’s going to be meaningful opposition.”
Dresser campaigned on a platform of vague positivity, and his protesters saw him a little more than a figurehead, a unionist, a tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny. But his supporters say he has a strong spine – and remember that he is not plagued by bitter internal strife in the past.
Katie von Till, a member of the United for Strength Slate, said: “Fran Dreser has taken a stand against the major studios.” ‘He held his ground. He knows how to look in the higher eye and say no. He did it for his own ceremony. No one tells Fran what to do. ”
Modin’s team alleges that negotiations with the Unit for Strength, Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, led by Gabriel Carteris, did not fight enough for residues and health plan credit. The first gains in membership in Los Angeles – where most employees perform – suggest that the issues resonate strongly with that group.
Ron Ostro, a member of Membership First Slate, said members of Los Angeles are more likely to experience a reduction in residues and the pain of losing health and pension credit than members in other parts of the country.
Astro said he was “willing to accept Fran’s words that he was going to be aggressive in our upcoming deal negotiations.”
Shane Austin, the first supporter of membership, argued that Cartier’s leadership held “a drumbeat of positivity in hollow words” and that dressers needed to equate membership with the real challenges to building trust.
The industry is changing, he said. “Look at the IATSE – they are working hard on the working conditions. We are living in a new era of labor in America. Relying on SAG-AFTRA to deprive itself on the national stage as a bona fide advocacy engine for our members. ”
Others worry that the dresser will leave valuable discounts on the table.
“If I were an AMPTP, I would see Fran as someone who was more interested in thinking like a producer than an aspiring SAG-EFTRA member,” Sharma said.
Unit for Strength Side Counters that both sides agree on the goal – they do not agree on how to get there.
Unit for Strength member Ben Whitehair said, “I don’t know if you can find an SAG-AFTRA member who doesn’t want more money, better protection and a safer set.” “But how do you do these things? Just saying, ‘We’re so angry’ – I don’t think it works.”
Whitehair further argued that dissenters underestimated the achievement of Cartier’s term, including discussing the COVID protocol that re-employed the industry after the epidemic.
Amir Talai, another dresser’s colleague, argued that he had already proved his worth by surviving a difficult campaign where he was attacked. A tweet Expressing skepticism about the 5G cell network.
“If everyone in the board room could go after him, contrary to his second guess, he would be in a great position,” Talai said.
But he said, according to the text, he was concerned that Los Angeles board membership would become more ineffective due to First’s gains and that it could become a “political weapon” against the national board.
“I think the campaign’s overly heated rhetoric, although it hasn’t changed seats too much, could have a more devastating effect on the governance process, which could ultimately hurt members,” Talai said.