Since these controversies have arisen, the issue of whether the use of a song at a campaign rally is covered by a blanket license placed at the host venue for all performances joins BMI Stones, claiming that Trump’s campaign is subject to a license specifically established for political use, which lyricists object to. Lets stop.
Jody Thomas, BMI’s executive director of corporate communications, has clarified the PRO’s position for him Diversity After the Stones statement was released on Saturday.
“BMI’s political entity license was applied for political propaganda about ten years ago,” Thomas said. “Since many political events and rallies are often held in places that usually do not require a music license, such as an airport hangar or a community area, a political agency license ensures that wherever the promotion is stopped, it is in compliance with copyright law. Venue licenses were never intended for political propaganda. So if a campaign tries to rely on a venue license to cover the use of its music, there is a risk. “
Continued Thomas, “BMI licenses political campaigns and events through its political entity or organization license, which explicitly states that a campaign cannot rely on a venue license to approve the performance of an excluded work. Therefore, any political campaign relies on BMI’s other political licenses.” Depending on his political affiliation, the musical instruments should not be withdrawn under license. “
News of the Stones and BMI working together on the issue was first published by Deadline.
An earlier statement said Diversity And the deadline, BMI, said: “The Trump campaign has a political entity license that allows public performances of more than 15 million musical instruments in BMI’s books wherever promotional events occur. There is no provision, however, if a BBII promotes a song by a writer or publisher. The BMI objected and sent a letter to the Trump campaign informing them that the Rolling Stones’ works had been removed from the publicity license, and advised the campaign that future use of these instruments would violate its license agreement with BMI. “
The Stones announced last weekend that the Stones would fight to remove their song from the campaign presence, uniting the Tom Petty family to issue a statement protesting the president’s controversial campaign rally in Tulsa, saying “I will not go back.” . Brendon Uri soon issued a stern statement condemning Trump’s use of panic! At the same gathering disco song “High Hope”. The long list of musicians who have publicly objected to the use of Trump propaganda songs includes Neil Young and R.E.M. Its Michael Steep.
Trump can’t get “what you always want” at the end of his campaign speech in 2016. After starting to use, the left-leaning, candidate also expressed a desire to send a message that should have the same headline thoughts and expectations.